Yep, the ‘magic’ reference was to show that I’m dumbfounded how good the G4’s images are at the individual pixel level, way beyond what should be possible given Bayer filtering from a RGB pixel matrix.

?? They were. Exactly.

Samsung makes it virtually impossible to tell. As Gavin says, the indicator is tiny, and otherwise it’s down to gut feel as to how the results look 😎

ohh shut up you fag….

That wasn’t so hard was it? Thanks. No need to slag people for nothing.

and yes thats my opinion you give your opinion dont counter others. that is what this forum is all about.i have both the devices and yes i can say g4 is good or is better at times but these images doesnt look like s6’s.

Nice. Thanks for the proof.

boy go n make babies with steve.

I got an error msg. 🙁

The reference to magic was not a good idea for sure. You have to know that Steve is a physics and data pro to get the irony, and many don’t. It is, in fact, meant to be hyperbole and I loved it, coming from someone so NOT into anything but data data data.

My impression of Steve after 5 years following his work and his content that he’s probably the MOST honest, trustworthy reviewer, even if I disagree with his opinions some times. That makes you a troll, tossing accusations like that.

Please don’t tell me you don’t even know if you’re comparing HDR to Non HDR shots? Seriously? these are meant to be controlled tests.

There is no additional detail looking at the shots, if your on a Galaxy S6 just open photos or similar app and do it manually and you will get the a similar result.

What about the Monster AKA Nokia 808 🙂 ??

you finally bought your iPhone 6 🙂 i just cant seem to put my finger on it on how i tend to prefer using the 6 camera over the 6 plus despite the OIS..i feel the camera software is a bit buggy once the ois comes in…i own both but i use the 6 more and more…however my daily driver would certainly be the G4 once it launches